As they were leaving the casino between approximately 8:00 and 8:30 a.m., they decided to play some games on a Wheel of Fortune progressive slot machine. STATEMENT OF FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY At approximately 12:30 a.m, the plaintiffs went to Harrah’s Casino in New Orleans and gambled in the casino for several hours. IGT, Inc., one of the original defendants in the case, is now appealing the trial court’s decision in favor of the plaintiffs. AFFIRMED This case involves a dispute over whether the plaintiffs, Garrett Griggs and Stephen Livaudais, won a slot machine jackpot. ![]() 601 POYDRAS STREET SUITE 2490 NEW ORLEANS, LA 70130 COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/APPELLANT, IGT, INC. PALOWSKY ADAMS, HOEFER, HOLWADEL & ELDRIDGE, L.LC. CHARLES AVENUE NEW ORLEANS, LA 70130 COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF/APPELLEE, STEPHEN LIVAUDAIS IRA J. ![]() BEZOU THE BEZOU LAW FIRM 534 EAST BOSTON STREET COVINGTON, LA 70433 COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF/APPELLEE, GARRETT GRIGGS LLOYD N. 2005-CA-0321 * COURT OF APPEAL * GARRETT GRIGGS AND STEPHEN LIVAUDAIS FOURTH CIRCUIT VERSUS HARRAH'S CASINO, JAZZ CASINO CORPORATION AND IGT, INCORPORATED * STATE OF LOUISIANA * * ******* APPEAL FROM CIVIL DISTRICT COURT, ORLEANS PARISH NO.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |